License.pub is a collection and selection tool for open-source licenses centered on 0PL (Zero Public License) and 1PL (One Public License). The page guides developers through two paths—“I want maximum freedom” and “I want to protect the spirit of open source”—to help them quickly choose between a permissive license and a reciprocal license.
0PL is similar to WTFPL, but with more formal wording. It emphasizes permission for commercial use, modification, distribution, private use, and closed-source use, with no restrictions at all; compared with MIT, it also removes the attribution requirement. 1PL is similar to GPL and has Copyleft-style reciprocity: it allows commercial use, modification, distribution, and network services, and includes a patent grant, but requires derivative works to use the same license, disclose source code, and state changes. The page provides a clear comparison between the two in areas such as commercial use, closed-source use, patent grants, and same-license requirements, with information organized in an intuitive way.
The usage instructions on the site are very basic: choose a license, copy the text into a LICENSE file in the project root, and add notices to the README and source code headers. The FAQ explains how the licenses differ from MIT/GPL, whether the license text can be modified, and questions around legal validity. The documentation is good enough for quick understanding, but it does not show any API, SDK, CLI, GitHub integration, self-hosting capability, or source repository information, so its ecosystem capabilities are relatively limited.
The page does not mention any paid plans, subscriptions, or commercial licensing, and the license text can be used directly. One important caveat is that the site explicitly states these licenses have “not been tested in court”; if in doubt, users should consult a qualified lawyer. Therefore, for enterprise compliance, cross-border distribution, or patent-heavy projects, this page should not be the sole basis for final legal decisions.
Its strengths are simple selection, clear comparisons, very low onboarding cost, and bilingual Chinese/English explanations. Its drawbacks are that the license scope is limited to 0PL/1PL, it lacks full alignment with mainstream systems such as OSI and SPDX, and it provides no information about maintainers, version governance, or ecosystem integrations. It is suitable for individual open-source authors, maintainers of small utility libraries, and anyone who wants to quickly choose between “extremely permissive” and “mandatory open-source inheritance.”
Based on the crawled text, access from mainland China cannot be determined, so china_access is marked as unknown. Alternatives worth considering include choosealicense.com, SPDX License List, the Open Source Initiative license list, and TLDRLegal.
⚠ This review is compiled from public sources and does not constitute a purchase recommendation. Verify all facts on the vendor's official site. Verify on license.pub official site.
license.pub is an Unknown Dev Tools provider. TG4G tracks its product information, an overall rating of 7.0/10, and a China-accessibility score of China direct-connect friendly. Click "Visit Official Site" to reach license.pub directly.