Dimension scores are derived from public data and fields; weighted into the composite. Reference only.
HotCRP is submission and peer-review workflow management software for academic conferences, journals, and workshops. It covers the full process from author submissions, PC conflict collection, review assignment, reviewing, rebuttals, and PC meetings through to preparing final publication materials. Its positioning is highly specialized: it is not a general-purpose collaboration SaaS product, but a professional system for program committees and conference administrators.
On the submission side, HotCRP supports easy-to-use and customizable submission forms, an optional registration phase, PDF format checks, and PC conflict collection. For assignment, it can collect PC preferences for each paper, supports manual, bulk, and automatic assignment, and emphasizes globally optimized automatic review assignment. On the review side, it offers customizable review forms, LaTeX math formatting, multiple review rounds, offline reviewing, external reviewer invitations, and delegation. Its search and tagging features are also strong: users can search and sort by arbitrary criteria, bulk-download papers and metadata, display scoring formulas, and mark papers with colors, styles, and emoji. Tracks provide fine-grained permissions and allow administrators to be assigned by track or by paper, making the system suitable for complex PC structures.
Pricing varies by site category. Conferences, journals, and workshops sponsored by ACM and USENIX can use it at no direct cost. IEEE-sponsored projects must pay after the submission deadline. Independent projects are billed at USD 7.50 per submission, with support limited to bug fixes only. Classroom use is free but unsupported. HotCRP.com is deeply integrated with ACM publishing services: it can handle eRights, final papers, ACM PDF compliance checks, font embedding, keyword and reference collection, session ordering, cover and table-of-contents generation, and export the file package required by the ACM Digital Library.
Its strengths are a complete workflow, strong review assignment, and powerful permission configuration, making it well suited to large academic conferences or events with complex rules. It also has a clear cost advantage in ACM/USENIX scenarios. Its drawbacks are that public information does not disclose common enterprise procurement details such as APIs, payment methods, SLAs, or compliance certifications; support for independent conferences is limited; and test sites have email and lifecycle restrictions. It is best suited to academic conference chairs, PC chairs, publication administrators, and teaching scenarios, rather than general enterprise approvals or project collaboration.
The source material does not provide information on network accessibility from China or local payment options, so china_access can only be rated as unknown. If a domestic conference requires stable access from mainland China, RMB payment, or local compliance, it may be worth comparing EasyChair, OpenReview, Microsoft CMT, or a self-hosted domestic submission and review system.
⚠ This review is compiled from public sources and does not constitute a purchase recommendation. Verify all facts on the vendor's official site. Verify on hotcrp.com official site.
hotcrp.com is an United States SaaS provider. TG4G tracks its product information, an overall rating of 8.0/10, and a China-accessibility score of China direct-connect friendly. Click "Visit Official Site" to reach hotcrp.com directly.