Dimension scores are derived from public data and fields; weighted into the composite. Reference only.
databasebenchmarks.net has the page title “PassMark Software - Database Benchmark Charts”, positioning it as a database benchmark chart site. The page text explicitly mentions “Database Benchmark survey charts, made with thousands submitted benchmark results”, indicating that its core purpose is to aggregate a large number of submitted benchmark results and present them as charts for users to reference when evaluating database performance.
Based on the captured content, it looks more like a public results browsing and comparison page than a full database benchmarking framework. The confirmed capability is displaying database benchmark survey charts. However, the page does not explain which databases are supported, what workloads are used, how metrics are defined, whether results can be filtered, or whether there are any languages, frameworks, APIs, or SDKs involved. The page also shows links to other PassMark tools, such as BurnInTest, PerformanceTest, OSForensics, MemTest86, WirelessMon, and Management Console, indicating that it sits within PassMark’s broader ecosystem of performance testing and diagnostics tools.
The captured text does not provide pricing information for Database Benchmark Charts itself. The page shows “Free Trial” and “Buy” links for other PassMark software, but that should not be used to infer that the database benchmark charts follow the same model. Open-source or closed-source status, self-hosting options, and private deployment capabilities are not mentioned in the text, so there is insufficient information to assess them.
Its strengths are its clear positioning and its claim to be based on thousands submitted benchmark results, which may make the sample size useful for broad comparisons. PassMark also has an established product lineup in PC performance, stability, and hardware testing tools. The drawbacks are also obvious: the public text lacks details on testing methodology, database coverage, submission validation, update frequency, export capabilities, and documentation, making it difficult to judge the rigor and reproducibility of the results. There is also no visible mention of APIs, SDKs, or integration capabilities that developers often care about.
It is suitable for database administrators, backend developers, and performance testers as a reference leaderboard during early-stage technology selection. It is not suitable as a direct replacement for serious internal benchmarking. The text does not provide information about access from mainland China or supported payment methods. If access is unstable, alternatives such as HammerDB, sysbench, pgbench, or TPC benchmark may be worth considering.
⚠ This review is compiled from public sources and does not constitute a purchase recommendation. Verify all facts on the vendor's official site. Verify on databasebenchmarks.net official site.
databasebenchmarks.net is an Australia Dev Tools provider. TG4G tracks its product information, an overall rating of 6.0/10, and a China-accessibility score of China direct-connect friendly. Click "Visit Official Site" to reach databasebenchmarks.net directly.