Dimension scores are derived from public data and fields; weighted into the composite. Reference only.
credits.txt is a contributor acknowledgment convention for websites: contributor names and descriptions of their contributions are written into a UTF-8 encoded plain text file and deployed at the site root as /credits.txt, accessible without authentication. It is also recommended to add <link rel="credits" href="/credits.txt" /> in the page <head>. Its goal is not project management, but to provide visible reputation and attribution for contributors who are not mentioned in the website’s text—especially open-source software developers.
Functionally, it is very lightweight: the core idea is simply to list contributors publicly and in a standardized way. The text mentions free tools that can generate the file automatically, including the creditstxt npm package for listing contributors to npm packages in use, the creditstxt RubyGem for listing RubyGems authors, and the git-creditstxt script for listing Git commit authors and committers. In that sense, it is more of a text convention plus a small ecosystem of tools than a SaaS platform. Its supported ecosystem explicitly covers npm, RubyGems, and Git; no integrations with other languages, frameworks, or cloud platforms are mentioned.
The text only mentions free tools, with no information about commercial pricing, paid plans, or payment methods. Deployment is naturally self-hosted: site maintainers only need to provide /credits.txt at the root of their own website. This keeps implementation costs very low and avoids introducing additional vendor lock-in. The text does not mention an API, admin dashboard, access control, or enterprise support.
Its strengths are simplicity, openness, and readability, making it easy to give public recognition to unpaid contributors. The npm, RubyGems, and Git tools can also reduce the manual maintenance burden. The limitations are equally clear: it is not a license compliance, SBOM, or dependency security auditing tool, and it cannot cover use cases such as legal compliance or vulnerability analysis. The text also does not explain standard governance, format validation, CI integration, or long-term maintenance support.
It is suitable for open-source project users, development teams, and website operators—especially sites that want to respect third-party contributions and display acknowledgments at very low cost. The text does not provide information about access from China, so this remains unknown. Since the core implementation is a self-hosted plain text file, actual accessibility depends on the user’s own website deployment. Alternatives or related approaches include humans.txt, README/NOTICE files, and more complete dependency license auditing tools.
⚠ This review is compiled from public sources and does not constitute a purchase recommendation. Verify all facts on the vendor's official site. Verify on creditstxt.com official site.
creditstxt.com is an Unknown Dev Tools provider. TG4G tracks its product information, an overall rating of 6.0/10, and a China-accessibility score of China direct-connect friendly. Click "Visit Official Site" to reach creditstxt.com directly.