Dimension scores are derived from public data and fields; weighted into the composite. Reference only.
According to the information on the CodiSec page, its core project, Veles, has been officially “retired,” meaning it is no longer maintained. The official statement makes it clear that development has stopped and no further support will be provided. Users who want to use it or continue development can download the source code under the open-source license and access the GitHub repository. The site also directs users to codilime.com to learn about the company’s current business focus, and provides a security research blog based on CTF competition experience.
Based on the captured page content, CodiSec is not currently an actively sold or operated cybersecurity product platform. Veles is mainly available as a source-code download and via its source-code repository, making it closer to an open-source security research project than a hosted security service or enterprise protection product. The page does not disclose specific protection types, detection targets, management consoles, alerting mechanisms, APIs, SIEM/SOAR integrations, or enterprise deployment options. As such, it should not be regarded as a complete production-grade cybersecurity solution.
In terms of pricing, the page only states that Veles is available under an open-source license and can be downloaded for continued development. There is no mention of subscription fees, enterprise editions, commercial licensing, or service packages. No compliance certifications or related information are disclosed either, such as ISO, SOC, GDPR, security certifications, or industry compliance statements. Most importantly, the official site explicitly states that “no support” will be provided, meaning users must bear the costs of building, maintaining, patching vulnerabilities, handling compatibility, and continuing development on their own.
The main advantages are that the project status is clearly stated, the source code is open, and it is suitable for security researchers, CTF participants, or teams with development capabilities who want to study or extend it. The GitHub repository also lowers the barrier to accessing the code. The downsides are equally clear: it is no longer maintained, has no official support, lacks product documentation and enterprise capability descriptions, and its current security, stability, and compliance suitability cannot be verified. For enterprises, relying on a retired tool creates ongoing operational risk.
It is more suitable for individual security research, teaching experiments, CTF post-event analysis, or teams that need to modify the Veles source code. It is not suitable for organizations that require an SLA, technical support, compliance documentation, centralized alerting, or production-grade protection capabilities. The page does not provide information about access from China, so it is not possible to determine whether it can be reached directly. Payment information is also not disclosed. For deployment in a Chinese enterprise environment, it is advisable to prioritize alternative security tools or vendors that are still maintained and can provide local support, compliance materials, and verifiable delivery capabilities.
⚠ This review is compiled from public sources and does not constitute a purchase recommendation. Verify all facts on the vendor's official site. Verify on codisec.com official site.
codisec.com is an Poland Security provider. TG4G tracks its product information, an overall rating of 6.0/10, and a China-accessibility score of Workable. Click "Visit Official Site" to reach codisec.com directly.