random-user-agent.com and requestpolicy.com are both overseas Security and are often compared head-to-head. This page lines them up item by item — rating, price, China accessibility, HQ, payments and refund policy — and ends with practical "which to pick" guidance.
Directory / Security / random-user-agent.com vs requestpolicy.com
On balance, random-user-agent.com comes out slightly ahead — it offers Close to its rival on most dimensions — little to separate them. That said, requestpolicy.com has its strengths too: Close to its rival on most dimensions — little to separate them. If that matters more to you, requestpolicy.com is well worth considering.
| Comparison | random-user-agent.com | requestpolicy.com |
|---|---|---|
| Category | 🛡 Security 浏览器隐私扩展 |
🛡 Security 浏览器隐私扩展 |
| Overall rating | 6.0/10 | 6.0/10 |
| Monthly price | N/A | N/A |
| Yearly price | — | — |
| China access | ★★★ Direct access |
★★★ Direct access |
| HQ | Unknown | United States |
| Network | — | — |
| Payment methods | — | — |
| Refund guarantee | — | — |
| Editor notes | 浏览器扩展可伪装设备UA，适合测试与隐私场景。 |
开源Firefox隐私安全扩展，较老牌。 |
| Data source | In-depth review | In-depth review |
The guidance above is auto-compiled by TG4G from public data and is not purchase advice. Always rely on the official site and your own testing. A green cell marks the better value on that dimension (higher rating / CN / refund, or lower price). Some links are affiliate links (rel="sponsored nofollow").
If you want all-round balance and reputation, choose random-user-agent.com; if your core need happens to be requestpolicy.com's strength (Close to its rival on most dimensions — little to separate them), then requestpolicy.com is the better fit. Either way, trial the cheapest plan for a week before committing long-term.
This page is a side-by-side reference, not purchase advice; prices and policies are per the official sites, and some links are affiliate.