poor.dev and thomas-holder.de are both overseas Dev Tools and are often compared head-to-head. This page lines them up item by item — rating, price, China accessibility, HQ, payments and refund policy — and ends with practical "which to pick" guidance.
On balance, poor.dev comes out slightly ahead — it offers Higher overall rating (6.0 vs 4.0). That said, thomas-holder.de has its strengths too: Close to its rival on most dimensions — little to separate them. If that matters more to you, thomas-holder.de is well worth considering.
| Comparison | poor.dev | thomas-holder.de |
|---|---|---|
| Category | 🔧 Dev Tools 开源开发者个人站 |
🔧 Dev Tools 开源开发者个人站 |
| Overall rating | 6.0/10 | 4.0/10 |
| Monthly price | N/A | N/A |
| Yearly price | — | — |
| China access | ★★★ Direct access |
★★☆ Mostly works |
| HQ | Unknown | Germany |
| Network | — | — |
| Payment methods | — | — |
| Refund guarantee | — | — |
| Editor notes | 可了解终端开源工具作者项目与博客。 |
含GitHub、PyMOLWiki、Inkscape资料。 |
| Data source | Auto-listed | Auto-listed |
The guidance above is auto-compiled by TG4G from public data and is not purchase advice. Always rely on the official site and your own testing. A green cell marks the better value on that dimension (higher rating / CN / refund, or lower price). Some links are affiliate links (rel="sponsored nofollow").
If you want all-round balance and reputation, choose poor.dev; if your core need happens to be thomas-holder.de's strength (Close to its rival on most dimensions — little to separate them), then thomas-holder.de is the better fit. Either way, trial the cheapest plan for a week before committing long-term.
This page is a side-by-side reference, not purchase advice; prices and policies are per the official sites, and some links are affiliate.