pangea.cloud and trivy.dev are both overseas Security and are often compared head-to-head. This page lines them up item by item — rating, price, China accessibility, HQ, payments and refund policy — and ends with practical "which to pick" guidance.
On balance, trivy.dev comes out slightly ahead — it offers Better mainland China accessibility. That said, pangea.cloud has its strengths too: Close to its rival on most dimensions — little to separate them. If that matters more to you, pangea.cloud is well worth considering.
| Comparison | pangea.cloud | trivy.dev |
|---|---|---|
| Category | 🛡 Security AI应用安全API |
🛡 Security 开源漏洞与容器安全扫描 |
| Overall rating | 9.0/10 | 9.0/10 |
| Monthly price | N/A | N/A |
| Yearly price | — | — |
| China access | ★★☆ Mostly works |
★★★ Direct access |
| HQ | United States | Japan |
| Network | — | — |
| Payment methods | — | — |
| Refund guarantee | — | — |
| Editor notes | 面向开发者的AI安全组件，出海应用适用。 |
Aqua旗下热门开源工具，适合DevSecOps。 |
| Data source | In-depth review | In-depth review |
The guidance above is auto-compiled by TG4G from public data and is not purchase advice. Always rely on the official site and your own testing. A green cell marks the better value on that dimension (higher rating / CN / refund, or lower price). Some links are affiliate links (rel="sponsored nofollow").
If you want all-round balance and reputation, choose trivy.dev; if your core need happens to be pangea.cloud's strength (Close to its rival on most dimensions — little to separate them), then pangea.cloud is the better fit. Either way, trial the cheapest plan for a week before committing long-term.
This page is a side-by-side reference, not purchase advice; prices and policies are per the official sites, and some links are affiliate.