sanctions.network is an open-source sanctions list screening API. It provides a simple JSON interface for searching the US OFAC SDN List, UN Security Council sanctions lists, and EU financial sanctions files by individual or entity name. It is more of a lightweight data service that developers can integrate directly than a full enterprise-grade compliance platform.
The service provides two endpoints: /sanctions for querying the sanctions data table, with filters such as source_id, created_at, and source, plus select for controlling returned columns; and /rpc/search_sanctions, which accepts a name parameter and uses trigram similarity for fuzzy name matching, allowing it to catch spelling variations such as Alexei/Alexey. Pagination is supported via the Range Header or limit/offset, with a default maximum of 100 results. The API is automatically generated by PostgREST, so it offers relatively strong query expressiveness and is well suited to developers familiar with REST and database-style filtering semantics.
The page clearly labels the project as Open Source and mentions schema.sql and PostgREST, but the main documentation does not provide full deployment steps. As a result, its open-source nature is clear, but the maturity of the self-hosting experience cannot be fully confirmed. Its data sources cover three authoritative lists: OFAC, UN, and EU. However, there is no visible support for additional regions, PEP data, adverse media, or integrations with commercial risk-control ecosystems. No official SDK is provided either; usage mainly relies on generic HTTP/JSON calls.
The hosted API is marked as free for any use case, which is a clear advantage, especially for prototypes, small teams, and internal tools. The documentation provides examples for querying, field selection, fuzzy search, and pagination, and links to the PostgREST documentation, which is enough for basic integration. However, it lacks details on authentication, rate limits, update frequency, error codes, SLA, and operational status.
The main advantages are that it is free, open source, simple to use, supports fuzzy matching, and makes it easy to sync a local copy. The drawbacks are also important: the disclaimer clearly states that accuracy, completeness, timeliness, and availability are not guaranteed, and that it should not be used as the sole basis for decision-making. It is suitable for developers building initial sanctions screening, auxiliary checks in KYC or transaction workflows, or local data synchronization. For heavily regulated scenarios, results should be cross-checked against official source lists or commercial compliance services.
The documentation does not provide information about network availability in mainland China, payment, or node locations; the service is free and does not require payment information. Chinese teams planning to use it in production should first test connectivity and latency, and prepare local caching or alternative data sources.
β This review is compiled from public sources and does not constitute a purchase recommendation. Verify all facts on the vendor's official site. Verify on sanctions.network official site.
sanctions.network is an Unknown Dev Tools provider. TG4G tracks its product information, an overall rating of 7.0/10, and a China-accessibility score of China direct-connect friendly. Click "Visit Official Site" to reach sanctions.network directly.