Risk and Response is a cybersecurity consulting service focused on enterprise compliance readiness, particularly helping clients prepare for SOC 2, ISO 27001, and HIPAA certification. It is not positioned as traditional security software or a managed protection platform. Instead, founder Jonathan Major provides security posture assessments, gap remediation, certification preparation, and strategic security program support in a Fractional CISO role. The site also mentions independent internal audit services for ISO 27001 and ISO 9001.
In terms of protection type, Risk and Response focuses on governance, risk, and compliance rather than technical products such as endpoint protection, WAF, SIEM, or vulnerability scanning. Its services cover security posture assessment, compliance gap closure, and audit preparation, making it suitable for companies that want to demonstrate security capabilities to customers and accelerate deal cycles. On compliance coverage, it explicitly supports SOC 2, ISO 27001, and HIPAA, with additional ISO 9001 internal audit support. For integrations, the site only states that it has hands-on experience with compliance platforms such as Drata and Vanta, and familiarity with cloud platforms, infrastructure as code, and cybersecurity best practices, but it does not provide a specific integration list. Management, alerting, and deployment methods are not disclosed, which suggests the delivery model is primarily human-led consulting.
The website does not publish packages, starting prices, project-based fees, or monthly advisory rates. It also does not disclose service levels, response times, delivery timelines, or team composition. Buyers need to use Schedule a Call to obtain a quote and define the scope. Because this is expert-led consulting, pricing may depend heavily on company size, compliance scope, and audit-readiness maturity, but there are no verifiable details in the public text.
Its main strength is that the founder has 25 years of experience across engineering, information security, and compliance, and has previously served as an engineering and security leader. This makes the service well suited to understanding the intersection of cloud, engineering, and compliance. Its focus on common B2B, SaaS, and healthcare-related compliance needs is also clear. The downside is the limited public information: there are no customer case studies, certification outcomes, team size details, methodology templates, or descriptions of ongoing operational support. It is also not an automated compliance platform, so companies that need continuous evidence collection, control monitoring, and dashboards may still need tools such as Drata or Vanta alongside the consulting service.
Risk and Response is best suited for SaaS, cloud service, data platform, and healthcare-related companies preparing for SOC 2, ISO 27001, or HIPAA, especially teams without a full-time CISO that need executive-level security governance and an audit-readiness roadmap. The site does not provide enough information to assess accessibility from China, and payment methods are not disclosed. Chinese companies should confirm remote communication arrangements, contract payment methods, time zone support, and cross-border compliance adaptation. Alternatives include platforms such as Drata, Vanta, and Secureframe, as well as domestic or international audit and consulting firms that provide ISO 27001, MLPS, and other compliance consulting services.
β This review is compiled from public sources and does not constitute a purchase recommendation. Verify all facts on the vendor's official site. Verify on riskandresponse.com official site.
riskandresponse.com is an United States Cybersecurity provider. TG4G tracks its product information, an overall rating of 6.0/10, and a China-accessibility score of Workable. Click "Visit Official Site" to reach riskandresponse.com directly.