mastersinprocess.nl

What It Is

Masters in Process is a Dutch cloud-based project and process management platform built around an integrated “planning, uren, chat, inspecties” workflow. Through its management portal, teams can create projects, tasks, forms, documents, and work instructions, while employees, external collaborators, and partners can use the MIP Portal and mobile app to submit task updates, approvals, work forms, and inspection reports in real time. It is best suited to field-based and process-oriented project management.

Core Features and Collaboration

Based on the available information, its core modules cover task-driven planning, planning boards, time tracking, chat, inspections, quality control, safety registration, acceptance reports, project templates, custom forms, document instructions, database analysis, and built-in reporting. For collaboration, external project participants can be added to project groups with one click, tasks can be assigned to individuals or teams, and the system supports relatively complete capacity planning. For teams that need to collect quality, safety, and progress data on project sites, this “portal + mobile app” structure is fairly practical.

Pricing, Trial, and Deployment

The product is cloudbased software. The official website clearly offers a 30-day free trial with no obligation, with pricing starting at €13.95 per month. It also emphasizes that no upfront investment is required and that companies need little in-house ICT investment or expertise. However, the public materials do not specify what this price includes in terms of users, projects, number of forms, storage, or feature limits, nor do they disclose whether an enterprise plan or custom quote is available.

Integrations, Security, and Developer Support

The website mentions an open API connection, suggesting that integration with other systems is possible, but it does not provide a list of specific third-party integrations, API documentation, or developer tools. On security and compliance, the messaging focuses more on simplifying certification processes such as KIWA, KOMO, NEN, and ISO, but does not disclose details on encryption, backups, audit logs, GDPR, role-based permissions, or other security controls. Larger organizations should therefore conduct further due diligence before purchasing.

Pros, Cons, and Best Fit

Its strengths are that its features form a fairly complete project execution loop, it is mobile-friendly, it supports collaboration between internal and external members, and it can use custom forms to capture structured project data. The main drawback is that the publicly available information is not very transparent, especially around plans, permissions, security, support, and the integration ecosystem. It is better suited to organizations in construction, engineering, contracting, quality management, field inspections, and similar scenarios where process traceability and mobile feedback are important.

Access from China and Alternatives

Access from China is unknown. Payment methods are also not disclosed, and the product may be more oriented toward local European business procurement. Chinese teams considering it should verify access speed, language support, local payment options, cross-border data handling, and support time zones. Possible alternatives include Asana, Monday.com, ClickUp, Wrike, Smartsheet, as well as Chinese tools such as 禅道, Teambition, and 飞书项目.