konstrukt.studio

What It Is

Konstrukt is a “Co-Construction” engineering partnership from Selego Studio, positioned as a CTO-level engineering partner for AI-native founders who build products with Claude Code. It is not simply a code-generation tool, nor is it standard outsourcing. Instead, founders continue building features themselves while Selego helps safeguard the architecture, data model, security, deployment, and maintainability.

Core Capabilities

The page emphasizes an “Expandable Core”: AI-generated code does not need to be perfect everywhere, but the data model, authentication and access layer, core API contracts, payment/AI model/third-party integration points, CI/CD, and environment paths must stay clean. During the collaboration, a Core Registry is maintained inside the repository, listing the files, tables, and contracts considered core. Selego also provides code reviews for every PR, with a promised SLA of 24 business hours, and takes responsibility for security, auth, integrations, deployment, rollbacks, monitoring, and incident response.

Process and Documentation

The process is relatively well structured: Week 0 involves a codebase health audit and delivery of a PDF report; Week 1 includes an approximately 8-hour bootcamp to configure the repository, write the Core Registry, and jointly ship the first feature. After that, the engagement moves into weekly 60–90 minute syncs, ongoing ADRs, and PR reviews. Each month, Selego provides a Health Report covering throughput, PR metrics, risks, agent activity, and roadmap notes. The page does not disclose specific languages, frameworks, cloud platforms, or toolchains, so technical stack compatibility still needs to be confirmed via an intro call.

Pricing and Value for Money

Pricing is public: Q2 2026 projects cost €3,000/month, including 2.5 engineer-days per week, 6 agent suites, infrastructure, and unlimited bug support within the retainer. The minimum commitment is 3 months, then month-to-month, with 30 days’ notice to cancel. Compared with hiring a full-time CTO or senior engineer, the price may be attractive for early-stage teams; however, for solo projects that are merely validating an idea, the 3-month commitment and monthly fee are still not cheap.

Pros, Cons, and Who It’s For

The main advantage is its very focused positioning: it addresses the problem of AI-written code being “fast but easy to lose control of,” and creates engineering guardrails through PR reviews, core boundaries, ADRs, deployment, and monitoring. The downside is limited service capacity—the page shows only 3 slots for Q2 2026. It also lacks information about supported languages, payment methods, time zones, and specific ecosystem integrations. It is best suited for early-stage SaaS/AI product teams that already have a prototype or codebase, where the founder is willing to write features personally but lacks senior architecture and engineering governance expertise.

China Access and Alternatives

The page does not provide details on access from mainland China, payment, or contracts, so china_access can only be marked as unknown. If access or payment is restricted, alternatives include local CTO consultants, software engineering studios, code review services, or building a similar workflow yourself with tools such as GitHub, CI/CD, monitoring, Sentry, Claude Code/Cursor, and related services.