Dimension scores are derived from public data and fields; weighted into the composite. Reference only.
Justice Judgement is a service presented on a Japanese website as an “IT lawyer team,” focusing on online defamation, slander, reputational damage, personal information leaks, social media backlash, impersonation, damage to honor, and related issues. It is not a firewall, EDR, or vulnerability management product in the traditional sense. Instead, it is a legal service for online content risk and reputation protection, with core actions including deletion requests, disclosure of sender information such as IP/UA, identification of the sender, criminal complaints, and claims for damages.
In terms of protection scope, the service covers scenarios such as 2ch/message boards, mirror sites, blogs, review sites, SNS, Twitter, Facebook, images, and video content. The website emphasizes that lawyers handle deletion requests based on the law, and notes that deletion requests made by non-lawyers may constitute “unauthorized legal practice.” This is meaningful for companies that need compliant removal and legal accountability. For management and alerting, the text mentions “negative site monitoring and deletion,” but does not explain whether it provides systematic monitoring, alert frequency, reports, or SLAs. Therefore, it should be understood more as a manual legal-handling service than as a continuously automated security operations platform. Integration capabilities, APIs, and connections with third-party SIEM or public opinion monitoring systems are not disclosed.
Pricing information is relatively clear: deletion requests start at a 50,000 JPY retainer and a 50,000 JPY success fee; deletion plus IP disclosure requests start at 300,000 JPY each for both retainer and success fee; criminal complaints also start at 300,000 JPY; out-of-court damages claims start at 100,000 JPY; damages claims start at 300,000 JPY; and online/IT consulting starts at 50,000 JPY per month. Since all prices are listed as “starting from,” the final cost, timeline, and success conditions for complex cases still need to be confirmed separately.
The main advantage is lawyer involvement, making it suitable for cases that require platform takedowns, identity disclosure, content preservation, and legal accountability. It covers multiple sources of negative content, including forums, SNS, blogs, review sites, and mirror sites. Entry-level pricing is also publicly listed. The drawbacks are that the website does not disclose specific lawyer qualifications, case studies, success rates, response times, or payment methods. It also lacks details on technical monitoring, alerts, and platform integration capabilities.
Justice Judgement is suitable for individuals and businesses facing negative posts, bad reviews, information leaks, or reputation damage in the Japanese internet environment, especially in situations where ordinary reputation management companies cannot remove the content and legal procedures are required. Access from China cannot be determined from the available text and should be marked as unknown. Cross-border use also requires attention to the scope of Japanese legal services, language communication, payment methods, and the rules of Chinese platforms. If the issue occurs on a platform within China, users should usually prioritize local Chinese lawyers, platform complaint mechanisms, and compliant public opinion monitoring services.
⚠ This review is compiled from public sources and does not constitute a purchase recommendation. Verify all facts on the vendor's official site. Verify on justice-judgement.com official site.
justice-judgement.com is an Japan Legal & Tax provider. TG4G tracks its product information, an overall rating of 5.0/10, and a China-accessibility score of Limited (proxy recommended). Click "Visit Official Site" to reach justice-judgement.com directly.