Dimension scores are derived from public data and fields; weighted into the composite. Reference only.
Grant Dash is an online collaborative platform for grant, subsidy, and competition submission review, provided by 见闻科技有限公司 / PlotDB Ltd. It organizes calls for submissions, proposals, reviews, stages, and result aggregation around “projects.” Typical use cases include cultural and public-sector initiatives such as the Taiwan Creative Content Agency, g0v Jothon-related education projects, and Taiwan Contemporary Culture Lab.
Its core value is moving the traditional workflow of Excel-based submissions, review scoring, and manual aggregation online. On the submission side, it supports unlimited proposal forms, customized forms, multiple-file and large-file uploads, with a maximum of 4TB per file. It also supports MP4/H.264 streaming video playback, making it suitable for applications involving film, creative work, and cultural content. On the review side, it provides both individual-sheet and master-sheet views, with reviewer scores aggregated into the master sheet in real time for projection and discussion during meetings. Rule options include point-based scoring, vote-based scoring, option sheets, subsidy amount allocation, and the Condorcet ranking algorithm. Multi-stage review sheets can also be created for eligibility screening, midterm review, final review, supplementary review, or on-site visits.
The platform supports quick creation of reviewer lists, quick-login links, shared passwords, and QR Codes, making it convenient for on-site or tablet-based reviews. The admin console supports real-time collaboration by multiple users, with settings taking effect after confirmation and publication. Schedule management can automatically switch permissions by stage. On the data side, the system emphasizes that complete case materials, uploaded files, and videos can be downloaded with one click and stored by proposal category, reducing the risk of platform lock-in. The website does not disclose information about encryption, auditing, backups, or compliance certifications.
The official website does not publish plans, pricing, payment methods, or free-tier policies; it only provides contact options for sales and demo pages. The text indicates that forms are currently often customized through discussions between engineers and clients, with the example on the right taking about one day to complete. This suggests it is more of a project-based SaaS/customized service than a fully self-service standardized software product.
Its strengths are a focused use case, strong review collaboration, flexible forms and stages, support for large files and video, and friendly bilingual switching. Its weaknesses are limited information on pricing, APIs, third-party integrations, and security/compliance, while customization may create delivery dependency. It is well suited to government agencies, foundations, cultural organizations, competition organizers, and organizations that need a serious review process. If all you need is a simple registration form or survey, a general-purpose form tool may be lighter.
Access from mainland China is not documented, and network availability and payment methods are unknown. Alternatives include Submittable, SurveyMonkey Apply, Award Force, and Evalato. In China, similar workflows can also be partially implemented using Jinshuju, Wenjuanxing, Tencent Questionnaire, or low-code platform combinations.
⚠ This review is compiled from public sources and does not constitute a purchase recommendation. Verify all facts on the vendor's official site. Verify on grantdash.io official site.
grantdash.io is an Taiwan Forms & Survey provider. TG4G tracks its product information, an overall rating of 7.0/10, and a China-accessibility score of China direct-connect friendly. Click "Visit Official Site" to reach grantdash.io directly.