double-blind.org

What It Is

double-blind.org, based on the crawled content, appears to be an informational site focused on anonymous review policies for academic conferences. Its pages list conferences such as AAAI, ACL, CVPR, ICML, NeurIPS, SIGMOD, STOC, and others in a table, indicating whether they are at least partially double-blind, whether they are fully double-blind, and whether they impose restrictions on arXiv or similar preprint servers. It is more like a static information repository than a traditional SaaS product or enterprise software.

Core Features and Information Structure

Its core value lies in presenting conference review models in one place, grouped into fully double-blind, partially double-blind, and single-blind conferences. Some conferences also include footnotes explaining requirements from venues such as ASE, CAV, ICSE, SIGIR, SIGMOD, and WWW regarding arXiv posting dates, anonymity, or differences in titles and abstracts. This is useful for authors assessing whether they can make a preprint public before or after submission.

Pricing, Collaboration, and Technical Capabilities

The crawled text does not mention registration, plans, pricing, trials, payment methods, or any descriptions of team collaboration, permission management, third-party integrations, APIs, or developer support. A “GitHub site” appears at the bottom of the page, suggesting there may be a public site or source-code entry point, but this is not enough to infer self-hosting, version management, or enterprise-grade support capabilities.

Pros and Cons

Its strengths are its focused topic, clear tables, and coverage of multiple top computer science conferences, helping researchers quickly understand double-blind review policies and preprint-related risks. Its weaknesses are that the depth and accuracy of the information depend heavily on ongoing maintenance; the crawled content does not show update times, source-tracing links, or an official verification mechanism. It also lacks software-style features such as search, filtering, notifications, and an account system.

Who It’s For and Access from China

It is suitable for researchers, advisor-led teams, and research administrators preparing submissions to international academic conferences, especially for compliance checks before submission. Access from China cannot be determined from the text and requires actual network testing. If the site is inaccessible, alternatives include checking each conference’s official CFP, OpenReview page, DBLP, WikiCFP, or submission guidelines from the relevant academic society.