cyberarmy.ai

What it is

Cyber Army is an Agentic AI security platform headquartered in Sunnyvale, USA, with a team background from McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator. Its products are split into CyberArmy AutoFix and Cyber Swarm: the former focuses on an autonomous remediation loop of “detect, fix, verify, deploy, and roll back,” while the latter provides AI penetration testing for public-facing attack surfaces and claims to generate a PDF report with real exploit evidence in around 20 minutes.

Core capabilities and deployment

AutoFix covers protection against CVEs, misconfigurations, CI/CD pipeline issues, code-level vulnerabilities, Secrets, IAM risks, and open-source supply chain risks. Its deployment model is not to make unrestricted changes directly in production. Instead, it connects to infrastructure through read-only API integrations, validates fixes first in an isolated production-clone environment, then deploys them after a CISO approval gate, with automatic rollback within 60 seconds. On the management side, it provides a control center, AI-explainable reports, and audit trails. Swarm requires domain verification via DNS TXT record, tests only the external public-facing attack surface, requires no credentials, and does not access internal systems.

Compliance, integrations, and pricing

On compliance, the main text says AutoFix can produce SOC 2, HIPAA, and PCI-DSS audit trails, and that Swarm reports can be accepted for SOC 2 / ISO 27001 audits. However, it does not clarify whether Cyber Army itself has obtained these certifications. For integrations, it explicitly mentions GitHub, GitLab, CI/CD pipeline, read-only APIs, and DNS verification. SSO and data residency appear only as FAQ topics, without concrete answers. Pricing is not public. Swarm offers free scans and early access, while AutoFix is in limited early access and requires contacting the company for a demo or PoC.

Pros, cons, and who it is for

The main strength is clear positioning: it goes beyond scanning and alerting by connecting prioritization, code-level fixes, production-clone validation, and rollback into a closed loop. This makes it suitable for security teams with heavy vulnerability backlogs that are also worried about automation breaking production. If Swarm can consistently provide real exploit evidence, it could also be valuable for compliance audits and fast external validation. The downsides are that the product is still in early access, while pricing, large-scale customer cases, data residency, SSO, and integration depth are not sufficiently disclosed. Claims such as “zero false positives” and “full penetration test in 20 minutes” also need to be validated through PoCs in customer environments. It is best suited to mid-to-large enterprises, growing SaaS companies, retailers, healthcare organizations, financial services firms, and enterprise CISO teams facing PCI-DSS, HIPAA, SOC 2, or ISO 27001 pressure.

Access from China

The main text does not disclose access from mainland China, payment methods, or local compliance support, so china_access can only be rated as unknown. Domestic teams considering similar capabilities may also evaluate Wiz, Tenable, CrowdStrike, Pentera, NodeZero, as well as local vulnerability management, attack surface management, and penetration testing providers.