Dimension scores are derived from public data and fields; weighted into the composite. Reference only.
Costlocker is a time and cost tracking SaaS product for agencies and project-based service teams. Its core goal is not simply to record working hours, but to help teams track project profitability, manage budgets, and optimize workflows. The page copy emphasizes “profitable agencies,” suggesting that its positioning leans more toward agency operations management and project profit analysis.
Based on the information collected, Costlocker offers time tracking, cost tracking, profitability analysis, budget management, unlimited projects, unlimited clients, and a desktop app. At the team level, it uses the concept of an “active user”: active users can access the system, log time, and be assigned to projects; deactivated users lose access, but their historical data is retained and they can be reactivated later. This is fairly friendly for agencies with frequent staff changes or unstable project cycles. However, the page does not disclose more detailed features such as approval workflows, role permissions, reporting methodology, expense categories, or invoice integrations.
Pricing is very simple: there is only an All-Inclusive Plan, priced at $12 per active user/month. Both monthly and annual billing are supported, with a 40% discount for annual payment. The platform emphasizes that there are no hidden fees, and that you only pay for active users, which can be adjusted at any time. For trials, it offers a 30-day free trial with no credit card required, lowering the barrier for teams to test it.
The text explicitly mentions API Integration, indicating that system connections or data synchronization can be handled through an API. However, it does not list specific third-party integrations, nor does it disclose details such as API documentation, Webhooks, SDKs, or other developer support. In terms of security and compliance, the collected page content does not mention SOC, ISO, GDPR, data encryption, or similar information. The deployment model is also not clearly stated, so it is not possible to determine whether self-hosting is supported.
The advantages are transparent pricing, active-user-based billing, a low-friction trial, and unlimited projects and clients, which is friendly for agency growth. The drawbacks are that public information is limited, especially around permissions, reporting, security compliance, and the integration ecosystem. It is suitable for small and mid-sized agencies that need to calculate labor costs by client and project and care about project profit margins. If a company has high requirements for compliance, complex permissions, or localized/on-premise deployment, further validation will be needed.
Access from mainland China is not covered in the available text, so it should be considered unknown. Payment methods are also not disclosed, and a USD subscription may require international payment capability. Alternative products to consider include Toggl Track, Harvest, Clockify, and Everhour. Domestic Chinese teams that prioritize local access, Chinese-language support, and easier payment may evaluate project management and time tracking solutions such as Feishu Projects and PingCode.
⚠ This review is compiled from public sources and does not constitute a purchase recommendation. Verify all facts on the vendor's official site. Verify on costlocker.com official site.
costlocker.com is an Czechia SaaS provider. TG4G tracks its product information, an overall rating of 7.0/10, and a China-accessibility score of Workable. Click "Visit Official Site" to reach costlocker.com directly.