Dimension scores are derived from public data and fields; weighted into the composite. Reference only.
Citrus is an AI contract analysis tool based in Sydney, Australia, positioned for vendor contract review “before signing.” Users upload a PDF or DOCX, and the system automatically identifies the contract type and applicable jurisdiction, then generates an English-language risk map, market benchmark comparison, and negotiation-ready redlines/counter-language in about 60 seconds. Citrus explicitly states that it does not provide legal advice; rather, it serves as a triage layer between procurement and legal teams.
The product covers 7 categories of vendor contracts, including SaaS/software, professional services, supply agreements, outsourcing/BPO, consulting, commercial leases, and NDAs. Typical review points include auto-renewal, liability caps, SLAs, data residency, and termination/exit rights. Its main differentiator is not chat-style Q&A, but plain-English explanations for each key clause, comparisons against market norms, cited sources, and suggested revision language. It is well suited for procurement teams to identify the 5–12 issues that truly need attention before escalating them to the legal team for confirmation.
Starter includes one free contract analysis with no credit card required. Solo costs AUD 290/month and includes 4 analyses, with overages at AUD 99 each. Team costs AUD 890/month and includes 8 analyses, unlimited seats, a shared library, and collaboration features. Enterprise is priced based on volume and customization needs, with support for custom playbooks, approval workflows, private benchmarks, audit logs, and a dedicated success engineer. Annual billing saves 22%, and nonprofits, educational institutions, and B Corps can receive a 40% discount on Team.
Citrus is relatively specific about privacy: tenant-level encryption, no use of customer contracts to train models, in-region processing, 30-day retention on the free tier, configurable retention on paid tiers, and immutable audit logs for Enterprise. Its terms also state that anonymized clause data is used for market benchmarking only with explicit user opt-in, and this is off by default. Limitations include: the underlying model is not disclosed; SOC 2 Type II is still in progress; reports are not guaranteed to be accurate or complete and cannot replace a lawyer; each file is limited to 50 pages; and there is no clear public information about API, SSO, or CLM integrations.
Citrus is better suited to procurement, legal ops, and in-house legal teams that review multiple English-language vendor contracts each month, especially for SaaS and services procurement under AU/US/UK/EU jurisdictions. A Chinese interface, China-law support, and Chinese contract recognition are not mentioned. Access from mainland China and payment availability are also not publicly documented, so they should be treated as “unknown.” If you need local compliance support, Chinese contract review, or domestic payment options, you may need to compare it with local contract review AI tools or enterprise legal management systems.
⚠ This review is compiled from public sources and does not constitute a purchase recommendation. Verify all facts on the vendor's official site. Verify on citruscan.com official site.
citruscan.com is an Australia AI Apps provider. TG4G tracks its product information, with monthly pricing from $890.00, an overall rating of 8.0/10, and a China-accessibility score of China direct-connect friendly. Click "Visit Official Site" to reach citruscan.com directly.