Dimension scores are derived from public data and fields; weighted into the composite. Reference only.
有据 (China Fact Check) is a fact-checking project focused on international news and information circulating in the Chinese-speaking world. It is not a traditional news portal or a social platform, but a public-interest content site that verifies claims about international news spreading across public spaces such as WeChat, Weibo, Douyin, Kuaishou, Zhihu, and Bilibili. The site explicitly describes itself as China’s first independent fact-checking initiative, follows relevant IFCN principles, and emphasizes fairness, transparency, and accuracy.
The site’s core function is publishing fact-checking reports, covering cases such as old videos being passed off as new events, AI-generated images or footage, mistranslations, images taken out of context, and misreadings of overseas policies. Each report typically explains the claim being checked, the context in which it spread, sources of evidence, the analysis process, and the final verdict. Its rating system includes labels such as “True,” “False,” “Misleading,” “Partly False,” and “Unverified,” making it easy for general readers to quickly understand the conclusion. The project also states that it uses publicly available evidence, interviews publicly identifiable experts when necessary, and has mechanisms for editorial review, corrections, and updates.
有据 is a free public-interest project. The text captured from the site indicates that it has no external investment and operates on a volunteer basis through online collaboration. Its content is free to read, and reposting is welcomed as long as the source is credited and the original meaning is not distorted. No information was found about memberships, subscriptions, paid databases, or commercial services.
Its strengths are its very clear positioning and focus on an area that has long been weak in the Chinese internet ecosystem: fact-checking international news. Its methodology is fairly transparent, with an emphasis on public evidence and editorial review. It also has practical value in addressing common forms of information pollution today, such as AI-generated videos, old images reused as new, and misinformation spreading across linguistic or cultural contexts. Its drawbacks are that the project depends on volunteer collaboration, so output and update frequency may be inconsistent. The website feels more like a list of articles, with no obvious advanced search, tag database, API, or bulk data capabilities. Its lack of a formal operating entity also means that long-term governance, funding disclosure, and organizational stability will need continued observation.
It is suitable for general readers who follow international events but are concerned about misinformation on Chinese social media. It is also useful for media editors, journalism and communication students and teachers, foreign-language learners, platform content moderators, and researchers in information literacy. For anyone who needs to quickly verify trending international rumors, it is a valuable reference source.
Judging from the site’s positioning, Chinese-language content, and contact information, it is intended for Chinese-speaking users. No information was found indicating that a proxy or login is required, so it appears to be directly accessible. However, actual access speed and stability may still depend on the server and network environment.
⚠ This review is compiled from public sources and does not constitute a purchase recommendation. Verify all facts on the vendor's official site. Verify on chinafactcheck.com official site.
chinafactcheck.com is an China News provider. TG4G tracks its product information, an overall rating of 7.0/10, and a China-accessibility score of China direct-connect friendly. Click "Visit Official Site" to reach chinafactcheck.com directly.