Dimension scores are derived from public data and fields; weighted into the composite. Reference only.
Ceetrix is a specification enforcement and specification management service for AI Coding Agents. Its focus is not on replacing code review, but on checking whether “the code meets the spec.” It builds a traceable chain across PRDs, designs, tasks, and test evidence, aiming to address issues such as agents forgetting context across sessions, requirements drift, and claiming work is complete without testing. The official site clearly states that it is in Beta, and it is currently free to get started.
The product centers on 13 Gates: from the existence of a test strategy, PRD-to-design links, design-to-task links, and test tasks, to task plans, completion evidence, test results, stale documentation detection, and LLM-based quality evaluation. Only when the Gates pass can an agent mark work as complete. This mechanism is well suited to bringing AI coding into a stricter software delivery workflow.
For integrations, Ceetrix connects to Claude Code, Cursor, and other MCP clients via an MCP server. Its terms also mention collaboration with coding agents such as OpenAI Codex. Login uses GitHub, while AI quality validation uses Google Gemini. The service states that it handles read-only metadata with no code access, but specification text and code diffs may be sent to third-party AI services for processing.
The current Beta is free. The terms of service state that there will be free and paid tiers in the future, with paid plans billed monthly or annually via Stripe, but the collected text does not disclose specific pricing. There is no visible information about open source availability, self-hosting, or private deployment; instead, the terms emphasize that the platform code and design are Ceetrix intellectual property and prohibit reverse engineering.
The main advantage is its very focused positioning: it fills a gap in AI programming tools, which can write code but may not necessarily write it according to requirements. The Gate design is detailed, making it especially suitable for team development, requirements-driven development, and scenarios where Claude Code/Cursor are used frequently. The downside is that it is still in Beta, and the official materials state that LLM judgments are advisory only and not guaranteed to be accurate. In addition, teams need to maintain PRD, design, and task structures, which may feel too heavy for small personal projects.
Access from mainland China cannot be confirmed from the available text. Because the service involves GitHub login, Stripe payments, and Google Gemini processing, real-world usage may be affected by network and payment conditions. Alternatives include existing project management tools, code review processes, and the built-in rules of AI programming tools, but these generally do not provide Ceetrix’s mandatory Gate chain from specifications to test evidence.
⚠ This review is compiled from public sources and does not constitute a purchase recommendation. Verify all facts on the vendor's official site. Verify on ceetrix.com official site.
ceetrix.com is an Unknown AI Apps provider. TG4G tracks its product information, an overall rating of 8.0/10, and a China-accessibility score of Workable. Click "Visit Official Site" to reach ceetrix.com directly.