Dimension scores are derived from public data and fields; weighted into the composite. Reference only.
Castingly is a professional casting platform for actors, agents/representatives, and casting teams. It brings role notices, actor profile pages, media portfolio hosting, submissions and filtering, project tracking, and collaborative review into a single system. Its positioning is to reduce communication friction in the casting workflow and keep decision records within each project.
For actors, Castingly offers features such as nationwide breakdowns, media uploads, public profile pages, highlights, direct submissions, and role notifications. For agents, it emphasizes roster-level submission control, visibility into client status, unified communication history, and client analytics. For casting teams, it covers structured intake, review statuses, shortlists, media playback, shared comments, callback timelines, reviewer assignment, aggregated voting signals, and analytics by project and role. On permissions and security, the site mentions role-aware access, audit logs, and secure media handling, but does not disclose specific compliance certifications.
Actor-side pricing is relatively clear: Starter Free is free forever, but only allows access to the latest 3 breakdowns and includes limited media storage. Core Pro costs $68/year, while Premium Pro+ costs $119/year, and both include a 7-day free trial. The platform also offers one-time media add-on packs, such as expanded capacity for reels, VO, headshots, and galleries. The page mentions billing every 4 weeks and annual savings, but does not list the 4-week pricing or disclose the full pricing model for agents and casting teams.
The main strengths are its clear vertical focus and multi-sided design around the casting process. It supports both actor exposure and submissions, as well as team review, project pipelines, and operational analytics. The free plan and trial also lower the barrier to getting started. The downsides are that details on third-party integrations, APIs, payment methods, internationalization, mobile apps, and compliance are missing, leaving insufficient information for enterprise procurement.
Castingly is better suited to actors, agents, and casting teams in the U.S. or English-language casting ecosystem, especially users who need to centrally manage media assets, breakdown submissions, and collaborative reviews. Access from mainland China is unknown, and payment methods are not disclosed. If your target users are mainly in China, you may want to consider local actor casting channels, or build a lightweight alternative workflow using Feishu/WeCom, forms, cloud storage, and project management tools.
⚠ This review is compiled from public sources and does not constitute a purchase recommendation. Verify all facts on the vendor's official site. Verify on castingly.com official site.
castingly.com is an United States Hiring & Remote provider. TG4G tracks its product information, an overall rating of 7.0/10, and a China-accessibility score of Workable. Click "Visit Official Site" to reach castingly.com directly.