brandeis.io

What it is

Brandeis Practice Suite is a custody platform for trade secret protection. Its core focus is not traditional firewalls, endpoint security, or vulnerability management, but helping enterprises handle registration, non-public status verification, chain-of-evidence preservation, and audit support for trade secret matters. Its target users include general counsel, R&D leaders, and audit teams, across industries such as manufacturing, biotech, AI and software, financial services, mobility, and cross-border M&A.

Core capabilities

Based on the available materials, Brandeis focuses on trade-secret protection. Starter supports registration of up to 1,000 trade secrets, non-public status verification in a single jurisdiction, and a standard hash-chain custody trail. Practice offers unlimited registrations, cross-border non-public status verification via KIPRIS + Semantic Scholar, an Audit Console, AI executive briefings, customer-managed keys, and IP allowlisting. Sovereign further supports single-tenant, air-gapped, single-region, or on-premises deployment. Management features include named administrators, R1–R3 roles, an audit console, and a senior customer success manager, but the public materials do not describe general security operations capabilities such as real-time alerts or SIEM/SOAR integrations.

Pricing and service

Its pricing emphasizes charging by matter rather than by seat. Starter and Practice are both quoted annually on request, while Sovereign is customized per engagement. Pricing is determined based on matter volume and jurisdictional scope. Eligible teams can receive a 30-day Practice trial. In terms of service, Starter provides business-hours email support; Practice includes a named CSM and a 99.95% uptime SLA; Sovereign includes a dedicated incident response team, quarterly executive reviews, migration, and training.

Pros, cons, and best fit

The main strength is its clear positioning: it is designed around the evidentiary quality of trade secrets rather than paper-based processes. It is well suited for managing high-value R&D assets across multiple teams, regions, and languages. Matter-based pricing may also work well for enterprises with many users but clearly defined project boundaries. The downsides are that the product is still in private preview, pricing is not transparent, compliance only mentions K-ISMS-aligned controls, and certifications such as ISO 27001 and SOC 2 are not disclosed. Payment methods are also unspecified. It is better suited to mid-sized and large enterprises facing trade secret litigation, M&A, or audit pressure, rather than teams looking for a general-purpose cybersecurity protection tool.

China access and alternatives

The main materials do not provide information on mainland China access, Chinese-language support, RMB payments, or local compliance, so china_access can only be rated as unknown. If using it in China, teams should carefully verify network connectivity, cross-border data transfer requirements, deployment regions, invoicing, and procurement processes. Alternative directions may include local data security governance, DLP, intellectual property management, electronic evidence preservation, and privatized document permission management platforms.