basedon.se

What It Is

BasedOn is a decision search and service platform for formal internal decisions, directives, and follow-up within organizations. It emphasizes “transparent and traceable” decision management, bringing meeting minutes, decision logs, directives, owners, and execution progress into a centralized cloud system. Its goal is to replace scattered Word/Excel-based decision registers.

Core Features and Collaboration

The core product includes formal decision entry, AI-powered automatic indexing and classification, role-based retrieval of relevant decisions, action assignment, real-time progress tracking, automated reminders, timeline views, decision trails, and audit history. The site also mentions features such as meeting management, calendars, Trees, Trace, and Timelines. For collaboration, individuals, roles, and teams can create internal “units” to manage meetings, notes, decisions, and priorities, with selective sharing and support for cross-functional collaboration. On the permissions side, it explicitly mentions role-based access, personal accounts, permissions, and usage tracking.

Pricing and Trial

BasedOn’s pricing information is relatively transparent: user licenses cost 100 SEK/month, billed by active user, and include full feature access, continuous updates, email and chat support, secure storage, and regular backups. Transaction licenses cost 100 SEK per decision registration, with no monthly fee, making them suitable for organizations with fluctuating usage that want to pay based on actual decision volume. The website says users can book a free demo or sign up for a trial, but it does not specify the trial length, limitations, or payment requirements.

Security, Deployment, and Ecosystem

On security, BasedOn highlights strict verification, role-based access control, secure data storage, regular backups, decision logs, and audit history, and says it uses industry-standard storage. However, it does not disclose specific certifications such as ISO, SOC 2, or GDPR. In terms of deployment, the product is described as being designed for cloud environments and running on a cloud platform. Information about third-party integrations, open APIs, webhooks, or developer documentation is not available, so its ecosystem capabilities remain unclear.

Pros, Cons, and Who It’s For

Its strengths lie in its focused positioning. It is especially suitable for boards, management teams, public-sector organizations, or knowledge-intensive organizations that need formal decision records, accountability tracking, and execution follow-up. The availability of both per-user and per-transaction pricing also helps organizations control costs under different usage patterns. The main drawbacks are the limited public information on customer cases, integration capabilities, compliance certifications, and private deployment options. Product maturity should be verified through a demo.

Access from China

The website does not provide information about China-based nodes, Chinese-language support, RMB payments, or local compliance, and access from mainland China is unknown. Domestic teams needing similar capabilities may also evaluate alternatives such as Feishu, DingTalk, Teambition, Notion, Confluence, and Airtable.