2facookies.space presents a Google Chrome browser extension called “2fa and Cookies.” Based on the captured page content, its core description is very brief: Installing Extension for Google Chrome, Get 2fa code, Save Cookies. It also provides entries such as Light, Full, Download ZIP, technical support, and “подать апил” (submit an appeal). The page does not disclose the company behind it, version notes, or any security and compliance information.
From the available text, the tool appears to focus on two sensitive areas: obtaining 2FA codes and saving Cookies. It is offered as a Chrome extension, so the only confirmed integration is with Google Chrome. The page does not state whether Chromium, Edge, or Firefox are supported, nor does it provide any API, SDK, CLI, or development framework integration details. For a developer-oriented tool, the absence of a permissions list, data-flow explanation, logging capabilities, import/export methods, and automation interfaces significantly limits its assessability.
The page mentions Light and Full, but does not explain the differences between them. It also provides no pricing, billing cycle, payment methods, or refund policy. Documentation quality is weak: apart from phrases such as “install Chrome extension” and “download ZIP,” there is no visible installation guide, permissions explanation, privacy policy, changelog, FAQ, or troubleshooting material. For a tool that handles 2FA and Cookies, these omissions are especially important.
The main advantage is its direct positioning: it seems to provide in-browser capabilities around 2FA codes and Cookie storage, and it includes a technical support entry. The drawbacks are more significant: disclosure is insufficient, making it impossible to determine whether it is open-source or closed-source, whether it can be self-hosted, whether data is stored locally or uploaded to a server, whether data is encrypted, or whether the extension requests excessive permissions. Both 2FA and Cookies are highly sensitive credential-related data. Without transparent security documentation and verification from a trusted source, it is not recommended for production accounts or important business environments.
It may be suitable for advanced users who are willing to audit the ZIP package themselves and only validate 2FA/Cookie workflows in an isolated test environment. It is not suitable for general users, enterprise production environments, or teams with compliance requirements. Access from China cannot be determined from the page content, and payment methods are not disclosed. Alternatives worth considering include Bitwarden, 1Password, Authy, or Google Authenticator for 2FA management, and mature Cookie management extensions or browser developer tools for handling test Cookies.
⚠ This review is compiled from public sources and does not constitute a purchase recommendation. Verify all facts on the vendor's official site. Verify on 2facookies.space official site.
2facookies.space is an Russia Dev Tools provider. TG4G tracks its product information, an overall rating of 3.0/10, and a China-accessibility score of Workable. Click "Visit Official Site" to reach 2facookies.space directly.