frevector.com and graphicskeeper.com are both overseas Design and are often compared head-to-head. This page lines them up item by item — rating, price, China accessibility, HQ, payments and refund policy — and ends with practical "which to pick" guidance.
On balance, frevector.com comes out slightly ahead — it offers Higher overall rating (6.0 vs 5.0). That said, graphicskeeper.com has its strengths too: Better mainland China accessibility. If that matters more to you, graphicskeeper.com is well worth considering.
| Comparison | frevector.com | graphicskeeper.com |
|---|---|---|
| Category | 🎨 Design 免费矢量素材 |
🎨 Design 免费矢量素材 |
| Overall rating | 6.0/10 | 5.0/10 |
| Monthly price | N/A | N/A |
| Yearly price | — | — |
| China access | ★★☆ Mostly works |
★★★ Direct access |
| HQ | Unknown | United States |
| Network | — | — |
| Payment methods | — | — |
| Refund guarantee | — | — |
| Editor notes | 提供SVG/EPS素材，设计和建站可用。 |
提供矢量、模板、字体等免费素材索引。 |
| Data source | In-depth review | In-depth review |
The guidance above is auto-compiled by TG4G from public data and is not purchase advice. Always rely on the official site and your own testing. A green cell marks the better value on that dimension (higher rating / CN / refund, or lower price). Some links are affiliate links (rel="sponsored nofollow").
If you want all-round balance and reputation, choose frevector.com; if your core need happens to be graphicskeeper.com's strength (Better mainland China accessibility), then graphicskeeper.com is the better fit. Either way, trial the cheapest plan for a week before committing long-term.
This page is a side-by-side reference, not purchase advice; prices and policies are per the official sites, and some links are affiliate.