envoyer.io and selfhostedserver.com are both overseas paas and are often compared head-to-head. This page lines them up item by item — rating, price, China accessibility, HQ, payments and refund policy — and ends with practical "which to pick" guidance.
On balance, envoyer.io comes out slightly ahead — it offers Higher overall rating (8.0 vs 7.0). That said, selfhostedserver.com has its strengths too: Close to its rival on most dimensions — little to separate them. If that matters more to you, selfhostedserver.com is well worth considering.
| Comparison | envoyer.io | selfhostedserver.com |
|---|---|---|
| Category | 📦 paas 应用部署 |
📦 paas 应用自动化部署 |
| Overall rating | 8.0/10 | 7.0/10 |
| Monthly price | $10.00 /mo USD |
N/A |
| Yearly price | — | — |
| China access | ★★★ Direct access |
★★★ Direct access |
| HQ | United States | China |
| Network | — | — |
| Payment methods | — | — |
| Refund guarantee | — | — |
| Editor notes | Laravel官方生态工具，适合PHP团队。 |
中文服务，面向不想手动配置 VPS 的用户。 |
| Data source | In-depth review | In-depth review |
The guidance above is auto-compiled by TG4G from public data and is not purchase advice. Always rely on the official site and your own testing. A green cell marks the better value on that dimension (higher rating / CN / refund, or lower price). Some links are affiliate links (rel="sponsored nofollow").
If you want all-round balance and reputation, choose envoyer.io; if your core need happens to be selfhostedserver.com's strength (Close to its rival on most dimensions — little to separate them), then selfhostedserver.com is the better fit. Either way, trial the cheapest plan for a week before committing long-term.
This page is a side-by-side reference, not purchase advice; prices and policies are per the official sites, and some links are affiliate.