decacopy.com and past.app are both overseas SaaS and are often compared head-to-head. This page lines them up item by item — rating, price, China accessibility, HQ, payments and refund policy — and ends with practical "which to pick" guidance.
On balance, past.app comes out slightly ahead — it offers Higher overall rating (7.0 vs 6.0). That said, decacopy.com has its strengths too: Close to its rival on most dimensions — little to separate them. If that matters more to you, decacopy.com is well worth considering.
| Comparison | decacopy.com | past.app |
|---|---|---|
| Category | ⚙ SaaS 剪贴板管理器 |
⚙ SaaS 剪贴板管理器 |
| Overall rating | 6.0/10 | 7.0/10 |
| Monthly price | N/A | $15.00 /mo USD |
| Yearly price | — | — |
| China access | ★★★ Direct access |
★★★ Direct access |
| HQ | Unknown | Unknown |
| Network | — | — |
| Payment methods | — | — |
| Refund guarantee | — | — |
| Editor notes | 轻量剪贴板工具，可提升日常复制效率。 |
支持搜索历史复制内容，年付15美元或终身50美元。 |
| Data source | In-depth review | In-depth review |
The guidance above is auto-compiled by TG4G from public data and is not purchase advice. Always rely on the official site and your own testing. A green cell marks the better value on that dimension (higher rating / CN / refund, or lower price). Some links are affiliate links (rel="sponsored nofollow").
If you want all-round balance and reputation, choose past.app; if your core need happens to be decacopy.com's strength (Close to its rival on most dimensions — little to separate them), then decacopy.com is the better fit. Either way, trial the cheapest plan for a week before committing long-term.
This page is a side-by-side reference, not purchase advice; prices and policies are per the official sites, and some links are affiliate.