codepaste.dev and quickvote.org are both overseas SaaS and are often compared head-to-head. This page lines them up item by item — rating, price, China accessibility, HQ, payments and refund policy — and ends with practical "which to pick" guidance.
On balance, codepaste.dev comes out slightly ahead — it offers Higher overall rating (6.0 vs 2.0). That said, quickvote.org has its strengths too: Close to its rival on most dimensions — little to separate them. If that matters more to you, quickvote.org is well worth considering.
| Comparison | codepaste.dev | quickvote.org |
|---|---|---|
| Category | ⚙ SaaS 在线投票 |
⚙ SaaS 在线投票 |
| Overall rating | 6.0/10 | 2.0/10 |
| Monthly price | N/A | N/A |
| Yearly price | — | — |
| China access | ★★☆ Mostly works |
★☆☆ Partial (proxy needed) |
| HQ | Unknown | Unknown |
| Network | — | — |
| Payment methods | — | — |
| Refund guarantee | — | — |
| Editor notes | 免费轻量现场投票工具，无广告无套路，适合演讲互动场景使用 |
验证页拦截，功能细节不可见。 |
| Data source | Auto-listed | Auto-listed |
The guidance above is auto-compiled by TG4G from public data and is not purchase advice. Always rely on the official site and your own testing. A green cell marks the better value on that dimension (higher rating / CN / refund, or lower price). Some links are affiliate links (rel="sponsored nofollow").
If you want all-round balance and reputation, choose codepaste.dev; if your core need happens to be quickvote.org's strength (Close to its rival on most dimensions — little to separate them), then quickvote.org is the better fit. Either way, trial the cheapest plan for a week before committing long-term.
This page is a side-by-side reference, not purchase advice; prices and policies are per the official sites, and some links are affiliate.