bitstor.com and storj.io are both overseas storage and are often compared head-to-head. This page lines them up item by item — rating, price, China accessibility, HQ, payments and refund policy — and ends with practical "which to pick" guidance.
On balance, storj.io comes out slightly ahead — it offers Higher overall rating (7.0 vs 5.0). That said, bitstor.com has its strengths too: Better mainland China accessibility. If that matters more to you, bitstor.com is well worth considering.
| Comparison | bitstor.com | storj.io |
|---|---|---|
| Category | 📦 storage 对象存储 |
📦 storage 对象存储 |
| Overall rating | 5.0/10 | 7.0/10 |
| Monthly price | N/A | N/A |
| Yearly price | — | — |
| China access | ★★☆ Mostly works |
★☆☆ Partial (proxy needed) |
| HQ | Unknown | United States |
| Network | — | — |
| Payment methods | — | — |
| Refund guarantee | — | — |
| Editor notes | 去中心化低成本存储，仍处stealth模式。 |
去中心化加密存储，价格低于AWS S3，数据分片分布存储，隐私性强 |
| Data source | In-depth review | In-depth review |
The guidance above is auto-compiled by TG4G from public data and is not purchase advice. Always rely on the official site and your own testing. A green cell marks the better value on that dimension (higher rating / CN / refund, or lower price). Some links are affiliate links (rel="sponsored nofollow").
If you want all-round balance and reputation, choose storj.io; if your core need happens to be bitstor.com's strength (Better mainland China accessibility), then bitstor.com is the better fit. Either way, trial the cheapest plan for a week before committing long-term.
This page is a side-by-side reference, not purchase advice; prices and policies are per the official sites, and some links are affiliate.