ac3-studio.com and has.studio are both overseas Design and are often compared head-to-head. This page lines them up item by item — rating, price, China accessibility, HQ, payments and refund policy — and ends with practical "which to pick" guidance.
On balance, has.studio comes out slightly ahead — it offers Higher overall rating (5.0 vs 4.0). That said, ac3-studio.com has its strengths too: Better mainland China accessibility. If that matters more to you, ac3-studio.com is well worth considering.
| Comparison | ac3-studio.com | has.studio |
|---|---|---|
| Category | 🎨 Design 创意技术工作室 |
🎨 Design 创意技术工作室 |
| Overall rating | 4.0/10 | 5.0/10 |
| Monthly price | N/A | N/A |
| Yearly price | — | — |
| China access | ★★☆ Mostly works |
★☆☆ Partial (proxy needed) |
| HQ | France | United States |
| Network | — | — |
| Payment methods | — | — |
| Refund guarantee | — | — |
| Editor notes | 巴黎、香港、西贡多地创意技术团队。 |
洛杉矶创意技术作品集，适合参考交互视觉案例。 |
| Data source | Auto-listed | Auto-listed |
The guidance above is auto-compiled by TG4G from public data and is not purchase advice. Always rely on the official site and your own testing. A green cell marks the better value on that dimension (higher rating / CN / refund, or lower price). Some links are affiliate links (rel="sponsored nofollow").
If you want all-round balance and reputation, choose has.studio; if your core need happens to be ac3-studio.com's strength (Better mainland China accessibility), then ac3-studio.com is the better fit. Either way, trial the cheapest plan for a week before committing long-term.
This page is a side-by-side reference, not purchase advice; prices and policies are per the official sites, and some links are affiliate.