quask.me

What It Is

Quask is an online tool for creating meeting polls and text-based polls. Its name comes from “Question + ask.” The site indicates that it is still in Beta Version and highlights Secure, Encrypted, and Hosted in the EU. Its core positioning is not as a complex survey system, but as a fast way to create a polling link and invite others to choose meeting times, meals, locations, topics, or submit short free-text responses.

Core Features and Security

The product flow is divided into type, details, options, settings, and completion. Meeting polls support date + time, date only, and date ranges; text polls allow custom options. In the settings, users can enable comments, restrict voting to logged-in users, control whether participants can see results, decide whether existing answers are shown before voting, and choose response modes such as Yes/No, Yes/Maybe/No, and Free text. After creation, Quask generates a participation link and an admin link; the admin link can be used to close or delete the poll.

Quask’s most notable capability is end-to-end encryption. The site explains that the title, description, options, and votes are encrypted using a key generated in the browser. The description, options, votes, and comments use AES-256-GCM; the key is appended to the link as #k=…, and without that link, the server and administrators can only see random data. However, the text also states that the title and participation link are stored server-side so that email notifications can include a meaningful subject and usable link. This is worth noting for highly sensitive use cases.

Pricing, Integrations, and Collaboration

The captured content does not disclose plans, pricing, paid features, or payment methods. It only notes that after registering an account, users can save links and export CSV/Excel files. For third-party integrations, the only visible capability is sending links via email; there is no information about calendar, Slack, Teams, webhook, or API support. Collaboration permissions are lightweight: they rely on link sharing, logged-in-only voting restrictions, and result visibility controls. Enterprise features such as team workspaces, role-based permissions, SSO, or audit logs are not mentioned.

Pros, Cons, and Who It’s For

Its advantages are simple creation, a clear privacy-focused design, and suitability for polling scenarios where users do not want the platform provider to read responses. The multiple response modes and result visibility toggles are also practical. Its drawbacks are that, as a Beta product, there is limited information available, and it lacks clear details on commercialization, service support, compliance certifications, and developer ecosystem.

It is suitable for individuals, small teams, community organizations, and event organizers who need to schedule meetings or run simple multiple-choice polls. If an enterprise needs complex survey logic, CRM/collaboration suite integrations, unified identity authentication, and auditing, alternatives such as Microsoft Forms, Google Forms, Doodle, Calendly Polls, or China-based options like 腾讯问卷 and 金数据 may be more appropriate.

Access from China

Based on the captured text, it is not possible to determine connectivity from mainland China, payment availability, or localization status, so china_access can only be marked as unknown. If using it with a team in China, it is recommended to first test access speed, email deliverability, and link-sharing stability.