BrooklynTracker calls itself “the most complete Pivotal Tracker successor” and is primarily aimed at teams migrating away from Pivotal Tracker. Its main value is not broad project management, but automated import of Pivotal Tracker project data via API, including stories, epics, comments, attachments, and users, helping teams preserve their existing agile workflows as much as possible.
Based on the main content, the product retains backlog management, story collaboration, and epic grouping features familiar to Pivotal Tracker users. Teams can discuss, provide feedback, and track progress around each story, while using epics to organize larger requirements or business goals. The page also mentions exporting data to Excel, which may be useful for offline analysis or reporting. However, the text also includes references to wages, receipts, VAT, and other items that do not align with project management, suggesting placeholder copy or mixed product information. Its actual capabilities should be verified further.
Pricing information is relatively opaque. The page explicitly says “Import your project for free” and “Start for free,” suggesting that there is at least a free import option or a free starting point. The legal terms also include sections on purchases, payments, and subscriptions, but no specific plans, per-seat pricing, free-tier limits, trial period, or payment methods are disclosed. In terms of deployment, the website and terms of service make it look more like a cloud SaaS product; there is no mention of self-hosting, private deployment, or an enterprise edition.
For third-party integrations, the only clearly stated capability is importing Pivotal Tracker data via API. There is no mention of common collaboration integrations such as Jira, GitHub, Slack, or Google Workspace. Security and compliance disclosures are also limited. Although the terms include privacy policy and user data sections, the main content does not explain encryption, backups, access control, audit logs, SOC 2, GDPR, or other requirements commonly reviewed in enterprise procurement. API and developer support also appear to be limited to migration imports, with no information about an open API or webhooks.
Its strengths are clear positioning and a straightforward migration path, making it suitable for heavy Pivotal Tracker users that want to quickly evaluate an alternative. Its weaknesses are the lack of information around monetization, permissions, security, integrations, and service support, which makes it less suitable for direct procurement by mid-sized and large enterprises. It is better suited for small agile teams, startups, or technical teams looking for a landing point for Pivotal Tracker migration to try first.
Access from mainland China is unknown. The page does not disclose local nodes, Chinese-language support, RMB payments, or invoicing capabilities. If domestic teams need stable access, compliant procurement, and local service, they may also want to evaluate alternatives such as Jira, Linear, ClickUp, Trello, Asana, as well as Chinese products like ZenTao and ONES.
⚠ This review is compiled from public sources and does not constitute a purchase recommendation. Verify all facts on the vendor's official site. Verify on brooklyntracker.com official site.
brooklyntracker.com is an United States SaaS Tools provider. TG4G tracks its product information, an overall rating of 6.0/10, and a China-accessibility score of Workable. Click "Visit Official Site" to reach brooklyntracker.com directly.