100percenthuman.dev

What it is

100% Human is a fixed-term developer service from Politepix. Its first product builds a sustainable UI and end-to-end test suite for an iOS or macOS app within six weeks. The premise is that code assistants can speed up feature delivery, but may also introduce product behavior changes that are hard to catch before release. Key interaction tests are therefore used to reduce regression risk.

Core capabilities

The service process is fairly clear. In week one, the team onboards into the project, adds capabilities related to test speed and maintainability, and prioritizes tests based on factors such as usage frequency, relevance to the product’s core selling points, safety, and complexity. In week two, it starts with the easiest but critical tests to expose integration issues. In week three, it tackles the hardest and most important tests to define the boundaries of the test system. From weeks four to six, it aims to complete as many remaining high-priority tests as possible and leave behind a test plan that can continue to be expanded. The emphasis is on “sustainably adding tests,” rather than promising to write every test in a single engagement.

Integrations, ecosystem, and prerequisites

The service is mainly aimed at Apple development platforms. The text explicitly supports iOS apps and macOS apps, but does not specify particular languages or testing frameworks. Ideally, customers should already have a list of interactions to test and a working CI system. CI can be integrated into an existing workflow, or set up with help from an add-on. Options include GitHub, GitLab, Xcode Cloud, or self-hosted runners where the team has sufficient internal security capabilities.

Pricing and business model

100% Human uses quote-based pricing. The website does not publish specific prices, only noting that it is “not cheap,” and benchmarks it against the cost of six weeks of work by a senior US-based engineer. It also offers add-ons for a 3-week test plan review and a 3-week CI/CD setup. Since this is not a standardized SaaS product, procurement evaluation should focus on the quote, delivery scope, acceptance criteria, and ongoing maintenance arrangements.

Pros, cons, and who it is for

Its strengths are a focused positioning and a practical process. It is especially suitable for iOS/macOS teams with complex products, teams still relying on manual QA checklists before release, or teams adopting code assistants. The drawbacks are its narrow platform scope, lack of pricing transparency, and the fact that delivery outcomes depend on project onboarding speed, code review, and CI capabilities. It is also not a good fit for teams looking for a general-purpose automated testing platform or a low-cost self-service tool.

Access from China

The main text does not state whether the website can be accessed directly and reliably from mainland China, nor whether local payment methods are supported, so its access status is rated unknown. Teams in China may also evaluate XCTest/XCUITest, Maestro, Appium, Detox, Xcode Cloud, Bitrise, or a self-hosted CI testing setup.