legalvoting.be

What It Is

LegalVoting is online voting software from Tilburg, the Netherlands, supported by LiveWall. It is designed for formal voting scenarios such as party conferences, shareholder meetings, association general meetings, and cooperative meetings. Rather than a generic survey or polling tool, it focuses on transparent, careful meeting-voting workflows that can produce results immediately, and can be paired with livestream production for online or hybrid meetings.

Core Features and Collaboration

Its core features include unique personal login codes or voting tokens, one vote per code for each motion, weighted voting rights, proxy/delegated voting, block voting, and user paced voting that can take place live during the meeting or over a defined period before or after it. Its vote-counting methods are relatively comprehensive, with support for Instant Run-Off Voting, Single Transferable Vote, and Borda Count, as well as ConsensIQ, a consensus voting method that allocates points over multiple rounds and gradually eliminates options with lower support. On collaboration, members can manage delegations through an authorization module, or the organization can collect proxy information and have LegalVoting enter it; however, the website does not disclose administrator roles, approval workflows, or a fine-grained permissions system.

Pricing, Security, and Integrations

Pricing follows a typical project-based / quote-based model. The website only offers demo requests and sales inquiries, and does not publish plans, participant limits, or per-event pricing. It also does not mention a free version. On security, the site states that votes are stored encrypted on EU servers and that eligibility is controlled through unique codes. However, it does not disclose details on GDPR implementation, audit logs, or certifications such as ISO/SOC. Integration information is mainly focused on livestreaming: streams can be pushed to YouTube, Vimeo, or private channels, and can also be brought into meeting tools such as Zoom, MS Teams, and Google Meet. No API or developer documentation was found.

Pros, Cons, and Who It’s For

Its main advantage is how well it fits formal governance meetings: weighted voting, proxy voting, complex counting methods, branded pages, registration, livestreaming, and support before, during, and after the meeting are all covered. It is well suited to political organizations, large enterprises, associations, and cooperatives. The drawbacks are limited commercial and technical transparency: buyers will need to confirm pricing, data processing agreements, availability commitments, administrator permissions, audit exports, and system integration capabilities separately.

Access in China and Alternatives

Its accessibility from China cannot be determined from the available text. Livestreaming paths involving YouTube, Vimeo, Google Meet, and similar services may be restricted in mainland China, so if Chinese participants are involved, network access, email deliverability, and payment/contract workflows should be tested in advance. Alternatives to evaluate include ElectionBuddy, Simply Voting, Assembly Voting, and Lumi Global. For lightweight voting, WeCom, Tencent Meeting, or Wenjuanxing may also be considered, but weighted voting, proxy voting, and audit capabilities for formal voting should be verified separately.